The problem with this is, as in RL, there's nothing to prevent candidates from saying one thing to get elected and then turning around and advocating for the exact opposite in dark smoke filled rooms where there is zero accountability, followed by lying about what they did in order to get re-elected. We need to know who is advocating for what exactly in these meetings. Otherwise the process becomes corrupt just like in RL.Well said.
The number of controversial positions in this document advocated by "the CSM" is rather staggering, honestly. "The CSM" has given voters little choice but to blame the entire group for whichever ones we want to. Two step, you're in favor of wormhole stabilizers. Trebor, you're in favor of super-cap blobs knocking out station services throughout NPC Venal.
More about these controversial positions tomorrow.