Welcome to Jester's Trek.
I'm your host, Jester. I've been an EVE Online player for about six years. One of my four mains is Ripard Teg, pictured at left. Sadly, I've succumbed to "bittervet" disease, but I'm wandering the New Eden landscape (and from time to time, the MMO landscape) in search of a cure.
You can follow along, if you want...

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

First checkpoint

Aaaand here's the first list of CSM7 candidates.

38 people as of 1300 on February 22, which is a bit fewer than I expected.  Apparently a few people had a problem with the "real name" thing or the passport thing.  Other than that, very few surprises on the list.

Things that jumped out at me:
  • Two Goonswarm candidates, The Mittani and Lyris Nairn.  No idea if Lyris is at all an official candidate.  Last year, the Goons ran four candidates, two of which were official.
  • Three TEST candidates, Dovinian, michael boltonIII, and Akirei Scytale.  Dovinian is the official candidate from what I understand.  Akirei appears to strictly be a troll candidate.  MB3 was directly not selected as an official candidate, but is apparently running anyway, on name recognition.  Be interesting to see if he draws TEST votes away from Dovinian.
  • Mintrolio is an Aussie.  That may be interesting only to me.  ;-)
  • A little surprisingly (again maybe only to me), there doesn't really seem to be a strong contingent of null-sec bloc candidates this time around.  Maybe they're better at hiding this year?  But there's only the one Russian bloc candidate, and other than the Goon and TEST candidates, there appear to be only one or two other true bloc candidates.
  • How'd you like to be on the list of the six people that passed the real name and passport requirement, but couldn't get 100 likes?  Given the list of people who did get 100 likes, this is not a strong endorsement for their candidacies.  ;-)
  • There don't appear to be any surprising missing candidates, with the possible exception of Iam Widdershins (who couldn't get a passport in time).  Everyone seems to have made it through this step without any problems.
  • And finally, I wouldn't want to be Leboe, Prom, Alekseyev Karrde, or Elise.  I think it's entirely possible that these four candidates might compete each other right out of a seat...

Looks like the final ballot is going to be between 38 and 44 candidates total (depending on how many of the final six get their 100 likes).  There were 57 candidates last year.  As a result, the goal of having fewer candidates this year than last was surprisingly successful.  But I'm definitely not convinced the petition mechanic had anything to do with it.  What did?  I think there were three factors involved.

First, I think a lot of people like myself that were considering running decided not to, either because they didn't feel they could get the votes, or because they'd take votes away from other candidates.  Part of this, I'm sure, is the extremely strong slate of CSM6 candidates running for reelection.  But a lot of it was almost certainly the number of alliances that crashed and burned this past year, or have suffered membership problems.  There aren't enough old-NC survivors to field a candidate, for instance.  Nor does NC Reloaded have a strong enough presence to field their own candidate (Raiden, not at all surprisingly, has endorsed super-cap friendly candidate Elise Randolph).  Much of the Russian bloc is in disarray, as is much of the southern bloc.  Without a strong base to start from, getting the needed votes would be tough.

Similar, but related, I think the Summer of Rage had an impact here.  There are tons of people that unsubbed from EVE over the summer, only recently resubscribed, but had enough lingering resentment about CCP to not want to go anywhere near CCP HQ.

Finally, I think there was an unspoken strategy among some of the CSM6 members to gently de-emphasize the overt public relevance of the CSM over the course of the year.  I've said a couple of times that I think this was a political ploy, and I think we can call it a successful one.  While CSM5 was extremely public over the entire course of their term (resulting in strong interest in running for CSM6, even among non-bloc candidates), CSM6 has been much more outwardly private, particularly late in the term.

What impact is this going to have on voter turn-out?  I initially thought that we'd see an overall 25% increase over last year's turn-out.  Now... now, I'm not so sure.  While I still think Mittens will pass the number of votes he got last year, I think overall turn-out might actually stay about the same or even go down a little.  Maybe I'm just a little more distant from this campaign than I was last year?  But there doesn't seem to be as much enthusiasm for the process as there was this time last year.  Could be wrong.  We'll see.

Anyway, one more CSM7 related post in the next few days -- my endorsements for non-incumbents -- then I'll get off the topic for a couple of weeks unless something interesting happens.


  1. "Mintrolio is an Aussie. That may be interesting only to me. ;-)"

    I am shocked! What do you mean the goat is a lie?!?

    Oh, and one of the dudes has 99 likes right now.
    /me grins

  2. That has cemented my vote got Mintrolio. CSM needs someone who can take the piss out of mittens.

  3. "A little surprisingly (again maybe only to me), there doesn't really seem to be a strong contingent of null-sec bloc candidates this time around. Maybe they're better at hiding this year? But there's only the one Russian bloc candidate, and other than the Goon and TEST candidates, there appear to be only one or two other true bloc candidates."

    This is an odd comment, there's a tremendous bloc presence this year.

    GSF, TEST, XIX, PL (with RDN/NCdot/Ev0ke backing for Elise), -A- (Greene Lee) and RZR are running candidates. RZR will need a little help to get in the top 7, but they mustered 1900 votes alone for Draco last year. That's six of seven.

    Null is focused more this year rather than vote-splitting because the Top 7 mechanic means more influence is concentrated in individuals, and the lack of procedural voting means that extra, non-Iceland seats aren't worth the risk of dividing a vote.

    The fights for slots 6/7 will be absolutely brutal, though that doesn't concern the blocs.

    1. Hm. Are we counting Elise as a bloc candidate now? Does that make Seleene a bloc candidate?

      I counted Greene Lee, yeah. Wasn't sure about RZR's candidate. That's why I said "one or two other" bloc candidates.

  4. Seleene was a bloc candidate last year, though he vehemently denied the sheer amount of support he got from -A-. His candidacy thread is completely fagged up by -A- people calling him a traitor and backstabber for joining PL after being elected, and he seems to be In Trouble. PL isn't formally backing either Elise or Seleene, but Elise is more of a stalwart. I don't think Seleene will get many PL votes.

    Elise has unofficial PL backing, as well as that of RDN/Ev0ke/NCdot. If that doesn't make you a bloc candidate, I don't know what does.

    Last year, Elise and Seleene were /also/ bloc candidates. It's just Seleene lost his bloc, and Elise expanded his to some PL allies.

    1. I don't deny it, I just have no idea how much there was. It was certianly nothing like what is being mobilized this year. I know that I didn't get 3800 votes from a-bloc anymore than you got over 5k from just Goons. :). As for my campaign thread, the trolling consisted of just a few posts each from two people, like ten posts out of over 180, both of which seemed to have moved on to greener pastures.

      I never planned or expected to get many PL votes. The Tech Cartel will vote as thier members wish, even if the leaders are publicly endorsing Elise. v0v. Regardless, I'm definitely not. Bloc candidate this year. :)

  5. Pretty big list. Even if Kelduum is not likely to be that great, or vocal, I'm putting my 8 votes towards someone who is less likely to screw anyone that isn't a null sec player just for lols. Time for the whole game to get some representation instead of the scraps thrown up from null.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.